News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by carabiner on Sunday February 05, 2023 @06:46PM (#34671162)
The tic tac was seen by naked eye though:

> During a routine training mission in 2004, Dietrich and her then-commanding officer had noticed an unusual "churning" of the ocean surface before seeing "a smooth, white oblong object resembling a large Tic Tac breath mint flying at high speed over the water."

Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by LewisVerstappen on Sunday February 05, 2023 @06:58PM (#34671286)
It was seen

- by multiple fighter jet pilots (in different planes)

- picked up by the fighter jet's radar

- picked up by the USS Nimitz's radar.

So yeah...

Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by natch on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:39PM (#34672136)
* * *
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by Sightline on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:48PM (#34672213)
Case dismissed, natch figured it out. Everyone go home and stop asking questions.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by narrator on Sunday February 05, 2023 @09:05PM (#34672336)
Coincidence theory at its finest.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by natch on Monday February 06, 2023 @06:40AM (#34676067)
* * *
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by naasking on Monday February 06, 2023 @08:38AM (#34677091)
Sure, so the best idea is clearly to just chalk it up to a prank and ignore it rather than try to prove it.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by revscat on Sunday February 05, 2023 @09:07PM (#34672352)
Nor do you that there were any embellishments whatsoever.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by elteto on Sunday February 05, 2023 @10:23PM (#34672926)
Wait, how do the logistics of this prank work? His buddy patched the plane's software on the fly (ha!) without anyone else noticing? Or he inserted some "prank" code into the main codebase, got it past what I'm sure is ton of code review hurdles without anyone noticing, then got it deployed to the plane before his pilot friend took flight that day?
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by imustbeevil on Sunday February 05, 2023 @10:41PM (#34673038)
So your position is that Aliens are more plausible than "he plugged a USB into the plane"?
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by kuschku on Monday February 06, 2023 @05:40AM (#34675676)
If you build a system, you'll know its flaws. A common flaw with radar systems is them detecting something that's not a plane as a plane - e.g., the sun over the horizon.

If he built the software that automatically rejects such mistaken identifications, he also knows in which situations you'll get a false positive reading, and can tell his friend the perfect timing for the prank.

Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by BbzzbB on Monday February 06, 2023 @02:32AM (#34674422)
One might think such an elaborate prankster would keep his benign pranks to himself when going on a podcast tour to protect appearances.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by natch on Monday February 06, 2023 @06:35AM (#34676041)
Going on a podcast tour to protect appearances? One would think he went on the podcast tour to seek attention, as pranksters are wont to do.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by BbzzbB on Friday February 10, 2023 @09:30PM (#34748971)
I meant he probably wouldn't publicly talk about his pranking history on his podcast tour if he wants to con everyone.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by natch on Thursday February 16, 2023 @08:11PM (#34829333)
I think there’s some subtlety there you’re missing, and that is that there’s is a kind of pleasure and prankster humor in revealing to the more perceptive subset of the audience that you pulled an epic con, while still keeping the con alive for another less perceptive subset.

For an example of this kind of prankster game see Woz’s short videos about how he sources (actually real, but he intentionally does not say that) two dollar bills in pads from a local printer “who gets them from another very high quality printer.” He knows some people get what he’s doing and others don’t, and that’s part of the fun.

And some people transition during the exposition from being people who are being duped, to people who realize they were temporarily duped. That’s another part of the fun.