News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:South Pole Topography by ttepasse on Sunday February 05, 2023 @05:36PM (#34670457)
As the poster of one of those comments I was rather irritated by the adjusted datestamp and doubted my own memory. Has there ever been discussion for the HN software to enable more metadata for moved comments, like "10 days (older thread)" or such?
Re:South Pole Topography by Amorymeltzer on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:20PM (#34672006)
I don't mean to take away from your entirely-valid response, but I was pleasantly surprised that something like that had been thought of, to ease the awkwardness in such situations. I imagine there's a bit of a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation.
Re:South Pole Topography by Qqqwxs on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:44PM (#34672178)
I'd also be interested in further discussion into something like that. Talk about deja vu.
Re:South Pole Topography by metadat on Sunday February 05, 2023 @09:19PM (#34672443)
It weirds me out too, I always have the same reaction. Have been so confused that I emailed staff about it, but turns out there's no perfect solution. If someone hadn't replied to my comment today I'd never have seen this again.

I wish my comment history ("threads" link at top of every page) would adjust to push the comment up so I'd be more likely to see the thread again or notice any replies without counting on email alerts.

Re:South Pole Topography by dang on Sunday February 05, 2023 @09:25PM (#34672498)
It's true, it's annoying—but the alternative is even more annoying: every related thread would fill up with "how can X be Y when the timestamp is Z and the other timestamp is W". I know that because it's what prompted us to relativize the timestamps in the first place.

I'm not averse to encoding more metadata in the HTML if people would actually use it, but I'm averse to displaying that sort of thing in the UI because I fear the downside would outweigh the upside.