Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by sandworm101 on Saturday February 04, 2023 @10:06PM
(#34661347)
Turnaround/prototyping. Getting a sensor onto a spy sat is a multi-year process of testing and validating. But a new balloon can probably be built and flown in a matter of weeks. So any country trying to learn how to spy from above might want to build up the relevant corporate knowledge using balloons.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by SpicyP on Sunday February 05, 2023 @01:51AM
(#34662611)
Why did they need to test it over the United States though? If the purpose was prototyping you’d think they could have done that locally
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by prox on Sunday February 05, 2023 @04:16AM
(#34663264)
Who is to say they already have? And they felt it was time to put the thing to use.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by psychphysic on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:19AM
(#34666079)
Testing acceptability?
Probably also why such a dramatic response from the US.
Before satillites flew over enemies no one was too sure if they'd be attacked immediately (they weren't).
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by vineyardmike on Sunday February 05, 2023 @04:43AM
(#34663398)
Chinese doesn't need to learn how to spy or build up knowledge, and they surely have plenty of satellites at this point.