Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by mrtksn on Saturday February 04, 2023 @04:37PM
(#34658613)
Congrats to the military then for letting the Chinese conduct surveillance in order to conceal the fact that they have employees with eyes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by yongjik on Saturday February 04, 2023 @04:44PM
(#34658685)
While being watched by the US military, thus giving it potentially valuable information on how China conducts its surveillance. It's turtles all the way down.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by mrtksn on Saturday February 04, 2023 @04:45PM
(#34658709)
For some reason a lot of people really want to believe that the military was all over it without any indication whatsoever. I guess it feeds from the need of knowing that someone(the correct one I guess?) is watching.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by rationalist on Saturday February 04, 2023 @04:53PM
(#34658774)
> For some reason a lot of people really want to believe that the military was all over it without any indication whatsoever
Not for me at least. I never claimed the military did anything (discovered it, surveilled it), just that it's possible that they could have done something without others knowing.
I just think it's extremely bad form to assume things that there's no evidence for - both about the balloon and the military, and about why people are commenting.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by mrtksn on Saturday February 04, 2023 @04:55PM
(#34658794)
A lot of things are possible, like maybe the God really put the fossils in the soil and the world is just a few thousand years old. That said, I usually like to have at least a clue about that being the case. Also, Occam's Razor.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by rationalist on Saturday February 04, 2023 @05:23PM
(#34659046)
I don't think we need to go off-topic and discuss theology here.
Regarding Occam's Razor, it's pretty simple that the military keeps secrets.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by klyrs on Saturday February 04, 2023 @05:14PM
(#34658964)
How did all the conspiracy theorists collectively forget how many spy satellites are in orbit? Were they flashy-thingied by the spy balloon, or do chem-trails (or the belief therein) cause amnesia?
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by flangola7 on Saturday February 04, 2023 @05:27PM
(#34659085)
Unless it flew over a secret research base I don't know what a balloon could gather that I can't already get from google maps or public USGIS datasets.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by kQq9oHeAz6wLLS on Saturday February 04, 2023 @07:00PM
(#34659901)
Signals intelligence
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by flangola7 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @10:12AM
(#34665497)
Like what? The radio waves traveling over the US are not a secret.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by kQq9oHeAz6wLLS on Sunday February 05, 2023 @07:53PM
(#34671781)
Think metadata, if you will. Where signals originated, how often and what times of day, etc.
Re:U.S. military shoots down suspected Chinese surveillance ...
by awlkjlekrt on Saturday February 04, 2023 @07:12PM
(#34659992)
The military is more concerned with pronouns than lethality.
Those doods wearing dog masks in their uniform should face capital punishment.