News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stop Developing This Technology. Parent comment

Re:Stop Developing This Technology by rbanffy on Thursday February 02, 2023 @06:32AM (#34625167)
> strains my assumption of good faith debate regarding their ethics.

Let's flip the argument upside down. Let's imagine you want to produce porn content, but don't want to be recognized. This technology allows that.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stop Developing This Technology by HellzStormer on Thursday February 02, 2023 @07:14AM (#34625502)
Side note about that: people doing amateur porn where their face doesn't show at all still get recognized because of particular marks on their skins. So this might help this very specific case, but maybe not as much as one would think.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stop Developing This Technology by soerxpso on Thursday February 02, 2023 @07:48AM (#34625793)
It's trivial to use Stable Diffusion img2img with low noise to change the marks on your skin.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stop Developing This Technology by aliqot on Thursday February 02, 2023 @08:47AM (#34626406)
this fucking guy
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stop Developing This Technology by Hamuko on Thursday February 02, 2023 @08:35AM (#34626285)
I've already seen porn where someone's face is blurred.

And whose face are you going to put in that porn with this?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stop Developing This Technology by IMTDb on Thursday February 02, 2023 @08:46AM (#34626397)
Emma Watson, probably
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stop Developing This Technology by tomjen3 on Thursday February 02, 2023 @02:16PM (#34631666)
The readme for the repo has examples of AI generated faces. Think this person does not exist, but better.
[ Parent | on HN ]