News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Princeton CS Prof: ChatGPT Is a Bullshit Generator (2022) by SpaghettiX on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @05:50PM (#34619186)
GP did not mention disciplines, and I don't think individual disciplines are to blame.

The approach of evaluating students based on "text generation" is very boring to study for, easy to fool (a parent/guardian can do it, last year's students can pass you an A grade answer, ChatGPT can generate it) and doesn't prepare students for reality (making new things, solving new problems).

Re:Princeton CS Prof: ChatGPT Is a Bullshit Generator (2022) by xoac on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @06:18PM (#34619563)
What if the thing you are supposed to be making is written communication in the form of a document, or a book, or a paragraph explaining why production was down? What if the goal of these things was to make a student literate?
Re:Princeton CS Prof: ChatGPT Is a Bullshit Generator (2022) by picture on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @06:01PM (#34619333)
Not all of us can be making new things and solving new problems, however..
Re:Princeton CS Prof: ChatGPT Is a Bullshit Generator (2022) by juve1996 on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @09:02PM (#34621074)
How exactly do you teach "Making new things, solving new problems."?

How can you solve a math problem if you can't do basic algebra, even if you can run an algebraic statement through wolfram and get a result?

You learn problem solving largely through solving already solved problems in life. They're new problems to the student, not the teacher.