News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus by sterlind on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @02:42PM (#34616415)
why can't crowdfunding work for this stuff? I'd gladly chip in like, $1K or something, to fund the training of a ChatGPT-like LLM, on the condition that it's publicly released with no fetters.
Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus by kerpotgh on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @03:43PM (#34617396)
Seems like you would have to declare an entity to receive funds which is a no-no if you’re setting out to do something illegal.
Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus by sterlind on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @03:52PM (#34617536)
It's not illegal yet to train an LLM. Best to get started before they lock it down and entrench the monopolies.
Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus by zarzavat on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @03:58PM (#34617625)
We are currently at "mainframe" level of AI. It takes a room sized computer and millions of dollars to train a SOTA LLM.

Current models are extremely inefficient, insofar as they require vast internet-sized data, yet clearly we have not gotten fully human-quality reasoning out. I don't know about you, but I didn't read the entire Common Crawl in school when I was learning English.

The fundamental bottleneck right now is efficiency. ChatGPT is nice as an existence proof, but we are reaching a limit to how big these things can get. Model size is going to peak and then go down (this may already have happened).

So while we could crowdfund a ChatGPT at great expense right now, it's probably better to wait a few years for the technology to mature further.