Re:Do We Live in a Society Without a Counterculture?
by hbossy on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @06:52AM
(#34609295)
Taking established media and making it a LGBT story is has been pretty much mainstream for long time. We live in a world where all major corporations put rainbows on their logos for a month every year, just to meet the expectations of general audience.
Re:Do We Live in a Society Without a Counterculture?
by jacooper on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @07:08AM
(#34609402)
When did the audience ever want that?
Its rather a movement that companies just ran with, and audience tolerated or ignored.
Re:Do We Live in a Society Without a Counterculture?
by chasd00 on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @08:07AM
(#34609868)
If corporations don’t play along they certainly get punished for it. The audience expects them to be onboard or else.
Re:Do We Live in a Society Without a Counterculture?
by jacooper on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @11:09AM
(#34612505)
When was that the case?
Its not the audience really, but someone or something else.
Re:Do We Live in a Society Without a Counterculture?
by rightbyte on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @02:37PM
(#34616349)
I think it is virtue signaling to the elite.
Re:Do We Live in a Society Without a Counterculture?
by cfltlayoffs on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @07:07AM
(#34609394)
I do think Daniels are a great example of actual counterculture like this article is talking about. Swiss Army Man is weird as shit, and deeply affecting. EEAO has very much broken into the mainstream while preserving a lot of their style and sensibility. I think there will probably be a set of filmmakers in the future who saw their movies at a young age and thought "you can do that?"
Anecdotes aside, at least for independent artists it may be economical effects that constrain passion and make projects feel so for-profit. Which have always been a thing, unfortunately. Given technology, maybe there is so much art to consume that making art requires forgoing distraction and the general worry that the art will be bad (which is nonsense, because some art simply has a limited audience).
In today's era, stuff like EU art grants [0] can do some good, although I have the feeling that patronage-per-capita is considerably lower than it was in the past; it would be an interesting metric to look at and try best to increase.
[0]: https://culture.ec.europa.eu/funding/cultureu-funding-guide