Re:Cistercian Numerals
by mcphage on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @02:44PM
(#34600777)
You're right, that does seem a better way to encode these—but that kind of encoding design I believe Unicode is wary of doing themselves. They seem to prefer sticking with a community-picked encoding instead.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cistercian Numerals
by WorldMaker on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @05:01PM
(#34602895)
Yes, I don't have an answer for that part and it makes sense of course, there's no reason to design an encoding that no one expects to use.
On the other hand, the above design idea (ZWJ sequences of arabic numerals with a "mode" marker) is offered free to anyone that does think they have a use for these numerals in Unicode and wants to turn it into a proper proposal.