News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Git archive checksums may change by blueflow on Monday January 30, 2023 @05:55PM (#34587805)
1) SHA-256 is reasonably secure

2) The checksum assures you that the file you have is the same your upstream looked at

Re:Git archive checksums may change by ErikCorry on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @03:31AM (#34592728)
1) Ah of course, this is SHA256, my mistake.

2) If I and the upstream are both looking at a file that was generated by Github then the Sha may match, but that doesn't prove we weren't both owned by Github.

Perhaps what I am missing is that this isn't part of a reproducible build scenario. There's no attempt to ensure that the file Github had built is the one I would build with the same starting point.

Re:Git archive checksums may change by blueflow on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @05:57AM (#34593672)
If you trust your upstream, then the checksum is enough. If you don't trust your upstream, its sort of an RCE anyways.