News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ejaculation Frequency and Prostate Cancer by adhd1110101 on Monday January 30, 2023 @01:03AM (#34576320)
Your position is both medically disproved and demeaning. Correct it please before you do more harm.

I made it to middle age without any ADHD diagnosis or stimulants, including coffee. My symptoms were present from early childhood and remain to this day, I expect I'll carry them to my grave. The entire time it's been an agonizing struggle, in ways I learned over decades were not normal compared to my friends and family.

I avoided diagnosis and medication due in part to stigma perpetuated by attitudes like yours. I suffered in silence for years that could have been avoided if only my condition were better understood and supported.

When I finally got a professional diagnosis, the stimulant didn't make me high the way it would do for you, it just made my brain act more like your brain on a normal day. My stresses and struggles became simply normal challenges, with the smothering layer of ADHD failings on top removed.

So at least in my adult experience, properly dosed stimulant medication given to people who need it can be life-alteringly effective, as close to a cure as a neurodivergent brain thinking today can hope for.

Re:Ejaculation Frequency and Prostate Cancer by n0tth3dro1ds on Monday January 30, 2023 @07:52AM (#34578979)
>Correct it before you do more harm

Stop telling me how to speak, you brain dead amphetamine junkie. I will speak as I please and dissuade as many people as possible from taking daily amphetamines with a junk diagnosis for a fake disease.

> When I finally got a professional diagnosis

You got tricked into doing brain-altering drugs by a drug dealer in a white coat. You couldn’t develop study or focus discipline as an adult so you took the nebulous, no-quantitative-measurement diagnosis and ‘script.

Re:Ejaculation Frequency and Prostate Cancer by dang on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @12:07AM (#34606645)
Yikes! You can't break the site guidelines like you did in this thread, regardless of how wrong others are or you feel they are. I know other commenters in this thread were also breaking the site guidelines, but you went way beyond them.

You've unfortunately been doing this in other places too:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34417737

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34417049

These are unquestionably bannable offenses on HN. I'm not going to ban you because you've also posted good comments and it doesn't look like we've warned you before. But if you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules from now on—that means making your substantive points thoughtfully and respectfully, and using HN for curious conversation, not battle—we'd be grateful.