Re:Australians Scour Desert for Dangerous Radioactive Capsul...
by dalmo3 on Sunday January 29, 2023 @02:23PM
(#34571694)
> People routinely get exposed to that during their normal job.
What jobs you're referring to? Your examples cite years and months but the quoted sentence states "in an hour."
Re:Australians Scour Desert for Dangerous Radioactive Capsul...
by roywiggins on Sunday January 29, 2023 @02:57PM
(#34572024)
It's all sort-of fine until someone brings it home and sticks it on a shelf and thereby kills their entire family. Walking around with this in your pocket will kill you eventually.
This sort of thing has happened before with loose radioactive sources.
Re:Australians Scour Desert for Dangerous Radioactive Capsul...
by testplzignore on Sunday January 29, 2023 @03:41PM
(#34572504)
To back up your point: If "X-ray" is a chest x-ray, then per https://xkcd.com/radiation/ this would be equivalent to one-tenth of a head CT scan, which are routinely done without consideration to any increased risk of cancer.
If the goal is to minimize loss of life, I think there are far better things that time could be spent on than looking for this thing. People are bad at thinking about opportunity cost.
Re:Australians Scour Desert for Dangerous Radioactive Capsul...
by tialaramex on Sunday January 29, 2023 @06:24PM
(#34573889)
You're bad at arithmetic, that's 100 boxes on the XKCD chart, so it's one-hundredth of a head CT scan, and the medics might not tell you they considered increased risk, but if they actually didn't consider it they're incompetent, that's a non-trivial effect.
The numbers matter. This instance, the device hardly matters. Not as much as a national news report anyway. We'd be better off reading about pay disparity or access to health care.