Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer...
by BolexNOLA on Thursday January 26, 2023 @03:15PM
(#34538096)
And in some ways it’s less work! The risks of using a real court case are massive if you ask me. We are a wildly litigious country. No amount of waivers will stop an angry American.
Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer...
by refactor_master on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:57PM
(#34540077)
> Run it multiple times with multiple defendants, set up a control group
And also
> That would be a lot more work, but it would also be much higher quality data
I don’t know much about the field of law, but anecdotally it doesn’t strike me as particularly data driven. So I think, even before introducing any kind of AI, the above would be met with a healthy dose of gatekeeping.
Like the whole sport of referencing prior rulings, based on opinions at a point in time doesn’t seem much different than anecdotes to me.
But I’d love to be proven wrong though.
Run it multiple times with multiple defendants, set up a control group that's receiving remote advice from actual lawyers, mask which group is which to the judges, then ask the judge(s) at the end to rank the cases and see which defendants did best.
That would be a lot more work, but it would also be much higher quality data than what they were trying to do.