News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by triceratops on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:33AM (#34532943)
> But this attitude only upsets people who thought jobs were not transactional

It's entirely possible to believe your job is transactional while expecting accountability for all underperforming colleagues, at all levels. Rather than just the rank-and-file.

Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by renewiltord on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:41AM (#34533094)
This is why it is important to fire people who push regressions to production. Accountability is important!
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by triceratops on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:48AM (#34533212)
Maybe? Depends on the severity of the regression, how much it cost, whether there was negligence or carelessness involved etc. And arguably you'd first fire the person who set up a process that allows regressions to be pushed to prod so easily.

Underperformance is not a single mistake. It's a pattern of behaviors that compound.

Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by bagacrap on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:24PM (#34534947)
A CEO looking at the economic climate of 2020-2021 and thinking they needed to hire to support the growth in demand for their products is not being negligent, they simply lacked the crystal ball that would have told them the Fed was going to slam the brakes on the economy last year. Even the Fed said they wouldn't be doing that. In light of what's happened, companies need to get leaner to survive.

Now if these CEOs don't manage to turn the ship around in the next couple years it probably is in fact time to look for a replacement.

Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by folkrav on Thursday January 26, 2023 @01:54PM (#34536781)
Who in their right mind thought interest rates would stay that low and inflation wouldn't eventually catch up?
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by bagacrap on Saturday January 28, 2023 @07:46PM (#34563680)
Jerome Powell
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by triceratops on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:21PM (#34541706)
What's the point in paying people tens or hundreds of millions of dollars if they make the same predictions and bad decisions as everyone else? And have exactly one contingency plan if things go sideways? Which is also everyone else's plan btw and not even a very good one. They hired in a seller's market for talent, and are now firing in a buyer's market.
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by bagacrap on Saturday January 28, 2023 @07:48PM (#34563693)
You could hypothetically have a CEO that was good in a period of economic expansion but poor in a period of economic contraction. By the time you figure out you have one of these CEOs at the helm, it's probably too late to do much about it. And any replacement CEO you bring in is all the more likely to make drastic cuts to cost centers (headcount).
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by frank_nitti on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:34PM (#34535180)
Yep, we just had this happen with a newer staff member. When we contacted the primary maintainer of the regressed system, they replied “you need to overwrite XYZ binary/config files using the backup build from ABC machine after patching”… like how is this suitable for a prod scenario? We’d have been foolish to fire the new staff member who technically pushed the regression.
Re:Tell HN: Confluent laying off 8% of staff by renewiltord on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:36PM (#34541778)
Sounds like a lack of accountability. Heads must roll.