News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer... by TeaDude on Thursday January 26, 2023 @08:34AM (#34531417)
I'm interested. What sort of regulations do you think would affect the robo-lawyer space in the UK?

Self-representation is frowned upon and mostly disallowed. Lawyers are expensive. I'd genuinely consider having ChatGPT fight for me.

Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer... by danielfoster on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:11AM (#34531768)
Privacy seems like it would be a major issue. As a litigant, I would not want the opposing side piping my case information to a third party and having this information used to train the AI for future cases.

AI could be very useful for helping pro-so litigants prepare documents. I imagine with this use case as well as the oral argument use case, judges are also worried about low quality output wasting the court's time.

Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer... by etothepii on Thursday January 26, 2023 @03:06PM (#34537974)
Self-representation is frowned upon, "a person with themselves for a client has a fool for a client." But, where in the UK system is it disallowed, unless you are a repeated, "freeman of the land" nonsense spouter?
Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer... by TeaDude on Friday January 27, 2023 @03:24AM (#34543873)
Off the top of my head: depending on the jurisdiction there are several important legal documents that you are disalllowed from filing yourself and the judge is allowed to reject you with or without reason
Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer... by etothepii on Friday January 27, 2023 @04:06PM (#34551866)
Doesn't the comment I am responding to set the jurisdiction as the UK. Can you name any applications you can't make yourself.