Re:Mexico cracks down on solar geoengineering
by irthomasthomas on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:35AM
(#34530036)
Why don't they just stick to Colorado, where most other weather modification programs are run? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34380470
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mexico cracks down on solar geoengineering
by OtomotO on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:45AM
(#34530109)
Can you divide the effects from each other?
So if project A does something, what if it influences project B?
Re:Mexico cracks down on solar geoengineering
by irthomasthomas on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:55AM
(#34530181)
The signal is so weak, anyway, that's it's practically impossible to decide cause and affect. I think it's mentioned in that article that they start with an area that's already got some rain or snow clouds and try to boost their output by a few points and hope that a trend emerges over time.
Also, they do these on a small local scale, like spraying this morning to boost the rain this afternoon.
Re:Mexico cracks down on solar geoengineering
by rcme on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:52AM
(#34530158)
You need a permit in Colorado and the projects seem related to snow generation, which makes sense given that skiing is a huge industry for the state.
Re:Mexico cracks down on solar geoengineering
by schiffern on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:57AM
(#34530188)
> Colorado, where most other weather modification programs are run
Are you sure? That claim doesn't appear in the linked article.
Here's the official list of projects in the US:
https://library.noaa.gov/Collections/Digital-Collections/Wea...