News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts. Parent comment

Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts by Hedepig on Thursday January 26, 2023 @04:26AM (#34529525)
Despite productivity generally improving over the last few decades, wage compensation has not.

I'm concerned this will continue as a trend with any productivity improvements from these models.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts by foobarbecue on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:46AM (#34532212)
Right. Presented with efficiency gains, firms tend to increase profit, not wages. One way to change that is to give workers more bargaining power through market shifts or unionization.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts by sumitkumar on Friday January 27, 2023 @03:02AM (#34543754)
All the productivity gains are first transferred to the consumer(because of market dynamics) and then(by the market winners) to shareholders. The workers' wage market is not related to productivity but how the company is internally organized is linked to productivity.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts by Hellmitioksldf on Monday February 06, 2023 @07:46AM (#34676538)
My way helped me succeed. I took my skills and my achievements (which i made in my R&D Time) to another company and got more money and than i did it again and got more money again.
[ Parent | on HN ]