Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts
by Hedepig on Thursday January 26, 2023 @04:26AM
(#34529525)
Despite productivity generally improving over the last few decades, wage compensation has not.
I'm concerned this will continue as a trend with any productivity improvements from these models.
Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts
by foobarbecue on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:46AM
(#34532212)
Right. Presented with efficiency gains, firms tend to increase profit, not wages. One way to change that is to give workers more bargaining power through market shifts or unionization.
Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts
by sumitkumar on Friday January 27, 2023 @03:02AM
(#34543754)
All the productivity gains are first transferred to the consumer(because of market dynamics) and then(by the market winners) to shareholders. The workers' wage market is not related to productivity but how the company is internally organized is linked to productivity.
Re:Replacing a SQL analyst with 26 recursive GPT prompts
by Hellmitioksldf on Monday February 06, 2023 @07:46AM
(#34676538)
My way helped me succeed. I took my skills and my achievements (which i made in my R&D Time) to another company and got more money and than i did it again and got more money again.
This makes it so that 1. my quality overall becomes better and my bosses always liked that (doing things per hand are more error prone, not on time etc.)
2. I can go on holiday knowing my company doesn't need me desperate
3. I can spend the free time of actually innovating and bringing more value to the company/product
The problem is not automating yourself out of a job but not being able to leverage the new gained capacity.