News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stanford's New Study Validates Ancient Breathing Technique.

Re:Stanford's New Study Validates Ancient Breathing Technique by curiousDog on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @06:41PM (#34512258)
Not to digress but substack bas gotten quite annoying on mobile. Have to scroll through so much irrelevant BS to just get to the article, what the hell.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's New Study Validates Ancient Breathing Technique by gavanwilhite on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @06:49PM (#34512325)
I think this was done by the author to create engagement with their blog.

I'm not sure if there is a against this, but it feels kinda against the spirit of posting a title like this when it seems like the goal of the linked page is 20% to communicate the topic of the headline and 80% to drive you to other topics they have been posting about.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's New Study Validates Ancient Breathing Technique by randorand0 on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @06:49PM (#34512327)
it's a business, they're trying to make money first, everything else (including the actual articles) come second
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's New Study Validates Ancient Breathing Technique by czardoz on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @07:44PM (#34512783)
I'm always surprised when patterns like this actually work. But they do!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's New Study Validates Ancient Breathing Technique by articlemode on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @07:45PM (#34512790)
Try article mode extention
[ Parent | on HN ]