Re:Apple attempting to stop investigation into its practices...
by forgetfulness on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @08:53AM
(#34503520)
That nobody will code against forks that lack Google proprietary features.
Re:Apple attempting to stop investigation into its practices...
by fsflover on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @08:53AM
(#34503528)
And the cost to support this fork is increasing with time as Google constantly adds anti-features.
Re:Apple attempting to stop investigation into its practices...
by nemothekid on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @09:06AM
(#34503670)
>which is open source and therefore forkable
Unless you have the resources of FAANG, forking Blink is a pipedream. Brave doesn't have the resources, and Microsoft already gave up that dream. Web Browsers are insanely complex and fast moving; and maintaining a "living" fork of Blink is difficult as upstream doesn't make it particularly easy to downstream changes after you've made any sort of modifications.
Re:Apple attempting to stop investigation into its practices...
by Spivak on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @11:19AM
(#34505638)
> Web Browsers are insanely complex and fast moving
Which ironically, if say a major platform that everyone had to support slowed down their pace of development to be more conservative so you couldn't jump on features released two weeks ago that would be better for the browser landscape as a whole.
… which is open source and therefore forkable. Google forked Blink from Webkit. What makes you think that Brave and Microsoft can’t do the same?