News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Encrypting Data in the Browser Using WebAuthn by AlbertVAustin on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @06:08AM (#34502155)
> it passes the "your grandmother can use it" test IMO.

Indeed, but note that having the token is still rare. It'd be good if browsers exposed TPMs via WebAuth since they're more common on consumer-grade hardware.

And also the "minor" thing that having only one strong authenticator makes it super-easy to lose own data just in case the authenticator breaks etc.

Re:Encrypting Data in the Browser Using WebAuthn by cormacrelf on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @09:53AM (#34504282)
They do. At least Apple implements WebAuthn for Touch ID and Face ID on both its mobile and laptop platforms, using Safari.
Re:Encrypting Data in the Browser Using WebAuthn by jrockway on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @10:15AM (#34504576)
Windows also has this; they call it "Windows Hello".
Re:Encrypting Data in the Browser Using WebAuthn by justsomeadvice0 on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @04:36AM (#34516343)
> And also the "minor" thing that having only one strong authenticator makes it super-easy to lose own data just in case the authenticator breaks etc.

This is why I mentioned "esp with synced passkeys".

WebAuthn can use - but does not necessarily require - hardware-backed keys. iCloud passkeys are an example of an implementation of "soft" keys that are both transparently backed up and synced across the user's devices. Their interfaces are designed to make them difficult to leak (I'd imagine you'd need root+SIP turned off, or a really good OS bug), but are to my knowledge resident in device memory. This is tradeoff for usability. Grandma is never going to be able to use yubikeys to log into things, let alone set one up.