News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by DoingIsLearning on Monday January 23, 2023 @07:24AM (#34487996)
I was thinking the same thing but all those machine always use some form of flexible hose which from what I have seen are also chock full of plasticizers as well. Feels like a choose your poison sort of situation.

It would be great to have a reverse osmosis machine where only the membrane itself was plastic and everything else was glass or steel. But I am not sure anything like that actually exists?

Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by UI_at_80x24 on Monday January 23, 2023 @08:02AM (#34488272)
Ouch, that's a good point.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by xen2xen1 on Monday January 23, 2023 @08:27AM (#34488460)
I'd think the single hose /apparatus would have much less exposure than most water supplies, especially over time. Maybe run the water for a bit before using?
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by Cthulhu_ on Monday January 23, 2023 @08:37AM (#34488555)
I mean you could probably get copper piping to work on it with some plumbing skills and tools; copper is, as far as I'm aware, fairly inert in the human body. at the moment anyway.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by UniverseHacker on Monday January 23, 2023 @09:01AM (#34488780)
I’m not worried about that. I have a counter top RO machine made out of plastic but the water comes out at nearly 0ppm TDS, and it flows through the machine slowly, at low temp, and for a short time. Whatever is in there is orders of magnitude less than you would find anywhere else, it’s basically laboratory grade pure water.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by thearrow on Monday January 23, 2023 @09:05AM (#34488820)
Which machine do you have? I’ve been looking for a decent countertop RO system without much success.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by UniverseHacker on Monday January 23, 2023 @12:58PM (#34492431)
AquaTru. I'm pretty happy with it, purchased it used on eBay and put new filters into it.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by aliqot on Monday January 23, 2023 @03:59PM (#34494954)
RO Buddy is a good starter if you just want to try for 60ish dollars.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by chaxor on Monday January 23, 2023 @02:20PM (#34493595)
> laboratory grade pure water

"but that'll kill 'ya!"

Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by UniverseHacker on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @08:54AM (#34503533)
I know you’re joking, but I do add mineral drops to bring the TDS back up.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by Abrownn on Wednesday January 25, 2023 @12:02AM (#34514625)
Do you have a brand you like? I'm thinking of getting a countertop device soon and they sell a "re-alkalizes it" version but I don't know if that's "enough" and of the right type and I'd like to cover my bases in case it's not.
Re:Magnetic method to clean PFAS contaminated water by ohthanks on Monday January 23, 2023 @11:48AM (#34491301)
I sell residential RO systems. Industry wide the tubing is typically LDPE and the housings/fittings are mostly polypropylene. There is no real practical way to build a residential RO system without using these materials.

It's a trade off between different types of plastic / chemical exposure. Not really ideal but I suspect nearly all sources of treated water will have traveled through a similar amount of plastic to get to you.

Copper is avoided on RO systems because the post membrane water typically drops 1-3 points in PH and will slowly corrode and leech copper into the treated water. All post membrane fittings and tubing should be plastic/stainless, cheap brass fittings with high lead content are the biggest concern. This can be resolved with post membrane PH amendment but you then create a failure point that can cause heavy metal exposure or leaks if it isn't maintained.

You could build a system with steel housings and braided stainless hose but the size/weight and cost are not practical.