It is suspiciously close to 65536*1e6. Can't explain why it is $6 short though

No; it's close to 65356e6, not 65536e6 (4rd decimal is 3 not 5). Could be misreporting though...

“If we are going down, lets nerd snipe while we do!”

C'mon, this is serious money; you're off by a couple orders of magnitude: 2^36 =

  68,719,476,736

Which doesn't explain it. Maybe the subtracted $3 billion in other debts? Got to watch every penny, you know.

It’s really close to 2^16 * 1 million - 6$.

65,535,999,994 vs $65,355,999,994

No idea where the -6$ comes from or if the 535 vs 355 was intended.

That’s actually the exact same order of magnitude, FYI.

2^16 = 65536.

You're asumming the final number id managed by a sole number. Maybe there a "size" value and a "quantity" value.

An example would be a float representing the final magnitude over the base magnitude (i.e. thousands of dollars), and the base quantity of thosands of dollars an unsinged 16bit integer.

It would be a commonly considered weird approach (you could/should use Decimal types for money), but hey, the final number is strangely near to be such a typical number (2^16).

PS: Like a sibling suggested, other hypothesis is that maybe it was something akin to a bare napkin calculation/decision made by humans (with human errors) eventually digitalized.

> It would be a commonly considered weird approach (you could/should use Decimal types for money)

Money? Cryptocurrencies are way beyond that.