News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatRWKV, like ChatGPT but powered by the RWKV (RNN-based... by blagie on Friday January 20, 2023 @05:28AM (#34451095)
You're wrong on many levels.

The basic reason for binary is because it's generally faster, especially as you scale to smaller transistors with more noise.

Re:ChatRWKV, like ChatGPT but powered by the RWKV (RNN-based... by int_19h on Sunday January 22, 2023 @04:58AM (#34475895)
Here's how Brusentsov (who designed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun) described the rationale for his choice of ternary:

"At that time [1955], transistors were not yet available, but it was clear that the machine should not use vacuum tubes. Tubes have a short lifespan, and tube-based machines were idle most of the time because they were always being repaired. A tube machine worked at best for several hours, then it was necessary to look for another malfunction. Yuli Izrailevich Gutenmakher built the LEM-1 machine on ferrite-diode elements. The thought occurred to me that since there are no transistors, then you can try to make a computer on these elements. Sobolev, whom everyone respected very much, arranged for me to go on an internship with Gutenmacher. I studied everything in detail. Since I am a radio engineer by education, I immediately saw that not everything should be done the way they did it. The first thing I noticed is that they use a pair of cores for each bit, one working and one compensating. And an idea came to my mind: what if we make the compensation core do work, as well? Then each cell becomes three-state. Consequently, the number of cores in Setun was seven times less than in LEM-1."

(https://notesofprogrammer.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post.htm...)