Re:Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy (2008)
by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @04:14PM
(#34433173)
> bootstrapped businesses that may be took a decade to get to first few million which will be dead in VC terms
Isn't the criticism of the last decade of VC that it backed many of these?
Re:Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy (2008)
by pjerem on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @05:07PM
(#34433817)
It happened last year to my current employer. It also was the 20 years anniversary of the company.
Everything changed and I’ve seen it change from a small agile business with nice people to a baby corporation with up or out mentality, useless processes everywhere, harassment methods from HR department. In one year, VC money created as many millionaires as employee burn-outs.
Re:Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy (2008)
by codegeek on Thursday January 19, 2023 @03:07PM
(#34444943)
I don't think any VC would back a startup to get to 2M in 10 years. They may do it as a nice gesture if they were failing anyway but no VC would want that outcome after a decade. One example: Gumroad. The investors were nice to let the founder keep going while they let him buy them out for like $1 or something. Today Gumroad is much bigger and decently successful company. Mailchimp was bootstrapped for many years with a service component. If they had raised VC money, they would have been forced to pivot or die early.
More time. There are examples of bootstrapped businesses that may be took a decade to get to first few million which will be dead in VC terms. But they continued and got to 100s of Millions. VC model would tell them to kill it if after a decade, they were doing a lousy couple million in revenue even if on the right path with PMF.