News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by green-eclipse on Tuesday January 17, 2023 @11:20PM (#34423397)
> likely saved more lives than most doctors at this point

Care to elaborate on this ridiculous claim?

Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by gorango on Tuesday January 17, 2023 @11:45PM (#34423521)
What's ridiculous about stats? A Tesla with autopilot or FSD is more than 10x less likely to be in a collision, based on various US agencies stats. Average chance of collision is 1 in 366 for every 1000 miles driven. Something like 1 in 20000 of those result in fatalities. Now, take millions of Teslas equipped with any assisted-driving tech, multiply by miles driven, include the above averages, and divide by ten. Doctors would be jelly.

Perhaps you can elaborate on what strikes you as ridiculous about fairly straightforward stats? Surprised to see you on a ML thread...

Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by cjdoc29 on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @12:17AM (#34423664)
Can you cite "various US agencies stats"? I say this as someone who used FSD Beta for a full year and Autopilot (with Navigate on Autopilot) for over 3 years now. It would actually help the conversation here to cite it, though I never knew third-parties evaluated Tesla's claims/statistics.
Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by AlexandrB on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @09:40AM (#34427115)
There's also a strong selection bias to a bulk stat like the one parent mentioned. Teslas are expensive cars and I'm guessing their drivers are likely to be older, more affluent, and more educated that average - this all correlates to lower accidents/fatalities regardless of FSD[1][2].

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24103823/

[2] https://personalinjurylawyersaustintx.com/blog/education-lev...

Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by gorango on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @02:23PM (#34431625)
You are absolutely correct - Tesla's own report acknowledges this, but it also highlights how this safety stat is dwarfed when autopilot is active: https://tesla-cdn.thron.com/delivery/public/image/tesla/5f93...

Reference: https://www.tesla.com/VehicleSafetyReport

Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by eddsh1994 on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @12:57AM (#34423850)
Millions of Teslas equipped with ‘any assisted-driving tech’ != autopilot on FSD. We have to compare deaths in Teslas with deaths in other vehicles too, as that’s what people would use if not a Tesla.

The chance of fatality per collision is way off.

If you’re going to go down a rabbit hole we need to look at lives impacted by lithium mining compared to regular combustion engine vehicles.

While I appreciate your point I’d be surprised if the number of QALYs is higher from working on FSD at Tesla compared to being a doctor.

Re:Let's build GPT: from scratch, in code, spelled out by An... by gorango on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @07:59PM (#34435387)
You're probably right that fatalities per collision is off but plug in your own numbers and then divide by ten... or five... the point still stands. Autopilot has saved countless lives. And it was architected by a very small team, led by this one man. I think the true scale of their impact is yet to be realized.

I'll admit, the comparison with doctors was a little hyperbolic. But hey, in a few years of exponential growth and global scale, who knows...?