News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruby 3.2’s YJIT is Production-Ready by aidog on Tuesday January 17, 2023 @10:56PM (#34423289)
Funny that you say that. If AI writes code, it should be Ruby, because it's shorter and easier to read. I'm making a site and love ChatGPTs Ruby code.

PS: Any Microsoft people here? Ruby could be 10x faster on Windows, if we figure out how to load files faster! https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19325#note-11

Re:Ruby 3.2’s YJIT is Production-Ready by weatherlite on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @12:00AM (#34423585)
Ah I meant if the AI is so capable in writing code there won't be any need for a human to read the code anymore. The "code" will be a bunch of english requirements, like an essay describing the program. Its unclear what language ChatGPT would use in that case (and who cares if the human is no longer important?).
Re:Ruby 3.2’s YJIT is Production-Ready by jojo14 on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @12:55AM (#34423842)
If an AI were meant to write code it would be Python. That is english with very few syntactic sugar mainly parens and colons.

Unless the result wouldn't be meant to be read nor understood by anyone.

IMHO Python is the closest to pseudo-code specifications.