Re:Hyundai Head Unit Hacking
by photoGrant on Tuesday January 17, 2023 @06:56PM
(#34421275)
My spite trumps their audacity. If I count one more entity looking to shake my pockets empty every month, I'm gonna start calling these crooks Al Capone. No, I don't want to subscribe -- to anything. Anymore.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Do you think RICO statutes could be a way out of subscription hell? It smells like a racket but I don't think it legally meets the bar for extortion because it's an at-will transaction between willing parties, and no one is making anyone buy a car.
It does seem anticompetitive though so maybe there are antitrust and interoperability angles?
Re:Hyundai Head Unit Hacking
by calvinmorrison on Tuesday January 17, 2023 @08:20PM
(#34422156)
Everything is regulated. Why not a "no subscriptions on safety measures" isn't one i don't know. Having a warm butt is a safety measure
Too much wiggle room. A cold butt never killed anyone.
How about "no subscriptions on titled property"
Re:Hyundai Head Unit Hacking
by calvinmorrison on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:31PM
(#34447142)
I think that, subscriptions are fine for items that require a subscription. Sort of circular reasoning but, for example, OnStar or onboard wifi or other things of that nature makes sense as a subscription.
Compare to a heated seat. They are some of the simplest circuits out there. Apply 12V and it will heat up a nichrome alloy wire. Same way a cigarette lighter works.