I think I will start using the term "progressive politics" from now on (at least, as long as it makes sense).
Not to be glib, but this is the nature of "progress" - it changes things. ;)
Well, I genuinely hope you are right.. :)
But note that not everything that we call or called "progress" is necessarily positive. We have made quite a few mistakes before which we thought was progress.
Probably too many to mention, even, but as examples, I can think of the Dark Ages and Nazism.
Mind you, I'm not saying modern liberal politics can be compared to these examples! I don't even known that much about history to be able to comment on them.
It's just food for thought.
Also, I have no dog in this fight, I've been out of the US for a few years. Though my outsider perspective (right/wrong/indifferent) is that intersectionality has been a substantive policy plank on the left.
The right has utilized identity politics as a means to expand their "big tent" and to drive voter turnout.
When using an overarching term, I think "progressive politics" is less inflammatory than "woke" (which is generally not used for self-description). It has the nice effect of linguistically balancing out conservative politics - we can have "woke" versus "fascist", or we can say "progressive" versus "conservative".