News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by dzikimarian on Saturday January 14, 2023 @04:50AM (#34378871)
Try reversing this argument and talk about employee resisting much better offer, to remain loyal and you'll get eaten alive by commenters :-)
Re: by Aeolun on Saturday January 14, 2023 @05:23AM (#34379052)
Is that so? I see a lot of people not wanting to switch for solely more money because they expect to hate it at a potential new company.
Re: by dzikimarian on Saturday January 14, 2023 @05:58AM (#34379220)
Yes and the same works for founders. If they expect, they will hate it after buyout, they will probably resist.

But what if new opportunity is ok, gets you 30% more money, but your departure makes your current company very sad and perhaps worse place for everyone to work at?

I wouldn't expect a lot of support for the idea of staying if you ask the internet for an opinion.

Re: by TheOtherHobbes on Saturday January 14, 2023 @10:03AM (#34380801)
The two aren't unrelated. In the distant past companies had professional and personal development programs. Some even had a commitment to try to avoid layoffs.

When MBA culture took over in the 80s it became normal for companies to act like extraction machines. Employee loyalty crashed, with a corresponding increase in churn.

Taking investment money makes it hard to create a humane culture. But smaller private companies do at least have the option to consider it.