News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT Can't Kill Anything Worth Preserving by jrd259 on Friday January 13, 2023 @12:29PM (#34370914)
Apropos automated approval of "tone". The company I work for now has a policy that documents must not use any "potentially biased" terms (e.g. "whitelist" or "master"). We now have automated agents that do simple search-and-replace (e.g. s/whitelist/allowlist/) over our internal Wiki pages. With no intention of debating the value or politics of such a policy, I wonder whether anyone is contemplating employing ChatGPT for more pervasive automated tone-control.
Re:ChatGPT Can't Kill Anything Worth Preserving by DenisM on Friday January 13, 2023 @12:43PM (#34371107)
I also wonder how long until this is mandatory in pretty much every organization, at least in the US.
Re:ChatGPT Can't Kill Anything Worth Preserving by poszlem on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @08:14AM (#34426230)
Sounds like something "the Party" would want to have in 1984 to further cement the use of "newspeak".