News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Part II: The failure points from $5M to $100M in ARR. Parent comment

Re:Part II: The failure points from $5M to $100M in ARR by skrebbel on Thursday January 12, 2023 @01:28PM (#34358182)
Meta nitpick, and I’m not certain, but I think the author (named Tracy) is a she. Or a they which lets you avoid the problem altogether.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Part II: The failure points from $5M to $100M in ARR by williamstein on Thursday January 12, 2023 @01:38PM (#34358339)
You are correct. The author's pronoun is "she" and there is a bio page about her here: https://leade.rs/speaker/tracy-young
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Part II: The failure points from $5M to $100M in ARR by sieabahlpark on Thursday January 12, 2023 @01:30PM (#34358225)
Oh shut up
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Part II: The failure points from $5M to $100M in ARR by eadmund on Thursday January 12, 2023 @03:07PM (#34359565)
> Or a they which lets you avoid the problem altogether.

At the cost of being ungrammatical, inelegant and IMHO profoundly disrespectful.

[ Parent | on HN ]