News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Minimum Viable SEO.

Re:Minimum Viable SEO by helipad on Friday January 06, 2012 @01:51PM (#3434496)
The article mentions the beginner's SEO guide, but coming in at 2 pages, the Web Developer's SEO Cheat Sheet from SEOmoz is my go-to resource:

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-web-developers-seo-cheat-shee...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by dsrikanth on Friday January 06, 2012 @02:43PM (#3434705)
http://seoeducation.in/pdfs/SEO_Web_Developer_Cheat_Sheet.pd... - this should work
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by kruipen on Friday January 06, 2012 @03:39PM (#3434937)
The post is not intended to be a SEO guide. It is priceonomics's doing their SEO (getting inbound links, etc.).

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by thematt on Friday January 06, 2012 @03:05PM (#3434805)
Not arguing with the importance of some of those techniques, but just a word of caution that the document hasn't been updated since 2008.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by rhizome on Friday January 06, 2012 @02:21PM (#3434621)
I'm seeing only bad links to the PDF on that page.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by brador on Friday January 06, 2012 @02:30PM (#3434658)
Yep, same here. Google isn't helping either. Anyone want to upload the pdf for all?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by fedd on Friday January 06, 2012 @03:13PM (#3434836)
seo pages can't be found by google.

meta!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable SEO by iodave on Friday January 06, 2012 @03:15PM (#3434843)
Try it again. I was just able to access the pdf.
[ Parent | on HN ]