News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NanoGPT by adam_arthur on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @10:52AM (#34339795)
I’m all for thanking open source contributors, but your excessively prostrating wording is a bit much for me.
[dead]
Re:NanoGPT by idiotsecant on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @12:22PM (#34341171)
can't tell if you're making some kind of clever quip or if this is some random spambot just entering a random reverse DNS lookup line.
Re:NanoGPT by cs702 on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @01:23PM (#34342276)
If I overdid it, I'm sorry. I promise it wasn't intentional. My comment was a spur-of-the-moment, motivated by sincere gratitude :-)