Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to software companies

Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw... by jimmyhmiller on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @01:18PM (#34329096)

This blog does pretty good job summarizing Naur's points. (My only quibble is equating mental models with theory in Naur's sense, but its an okay approximation). I definitely recommend people read the original paper. It's a flawed but beautiful paper.

Shameless self plug:

We just did an episode on Naur's Programming as Theory Building in the most recent episode of the Future of Coding Podcast.

https://futureofcoding.org/episodes/061

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw... by kasbah on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @01:39PM (#34329401)

I was going to post this! I really enjoyed this episode (and also, all the other episodes of your podcast).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw... by fghfghfghfghfgh on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @03:16AM (#34336286)

Can you elaborate on why you think the paper is flawed please?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw... by jimmyhmiller on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @01:59PM (#34342853)

I think all papers are flawed in their own way. So it is not meant as a slight. It is actually my favorite programming related paper. That said:

I think Naur was just a bit to vague and assumed background knowledge of Gilbert Ryle where most people don't have any. I think a lot of people finish reading the paper and don't realize what Naur's notion of theory is or how his radical conclusions follow.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw... by fghfghfghfghfgh on Sunday January 15, 2023 @07:06AM (#34388799)

I don’t know Gilbert Ryle but I believe I understand the paper as intended.

What do they realize then instead?

[ Parent | on HN ]