Re:Crisis over The Atlantic: The near crash of Air Transat f...
by bambax on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:47AM
(#34324767)
0.635 mm is indeed an odd number. The thickness of a piece of 80gsm paper is 0.065 mm, so maybe what is meant is "about the thickness of ten sheets of paper"...?
Re:Crisis over The Atlantic: The near crash of Air Transat f...
by jamincan on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:23AM
(#34327231)
It's precisely 0.025 inches.
Re:Crisis over The Atlantic: The near crash of Air Transat f...
by intrasight on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @01:55PM
(#34329640)
Who else thinks that if a tolerance of the thickness of a sheet of paper, in a mechanic/maintenance setting, could cause the death of over 300 people, that there's a striking lack of fault-tolerance in the design.
Re:Crisis over The Atlantic: The near crash of Air Transat f...
by plasticchris on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:48AM
(#34324780)
It sounds to me like they stuck a machinists shim in there, effectively a bit of precisely measured metal.
Re:Crisis over The Atlantic: The near crash of Air Transat f...
by nick889996544 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @10:00AM
(#34325809)
Shim feeler gauges would be readily available in most shops checking wear on moving parts. 0.0025 inches (0.635mm) was included in the first high quality (gearwrench brand) set that I looked up online.
Re:Crisis over The Atlantic: The near crash of Air Transat f...
by mrguyorama on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:38AM
(#34325471)
Plane maintenance involves a lot of precise and specially designed tools.
If 0.635mm (an odd number itself which happens to be exactly 1/40th of an inch, or "25 thous" in American sizes) and they let it go that sounds really odd. That's literally the size of a grain of sand. If the concern is rubbing, sure that implies it will move during flight.