News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by danuker on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:25AM (#34324474)
If there's less crypto being issued than fiat, and demand were constant as a % of people's wealth (which I admit is a big if), then crypto is bound to go up.

There is no end date to government currency debasement.

Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by lottin on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:36AM (#34324630)
This is to say that if demand outpaces supply, price is going to go up. However, this is true of any asset. So why mention specifically 'crypto', as if there was something magical about 'crypto' that means it's bound to go up?
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by danuker on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:45AM (#34325566)
My point is yes, it is true of any asset. You might as well own cans of beans. But the purpose is to stave off the effects of monetary expansion while staying liquid. Cryptocurrency is in a special niche in that parameter space.

While other assets are bound to provide long-term returns greater than inflation (for example, stocks and bonds [1]), cryptocurrency can not surpass inflation long-term, but it still does so while demand is growing. In addition, even after it reaches a stable demand (which I reckon will be in 5-10 years, with market saturation), it will be a means of diversification (like gold is currently).

[1] - https://totalrealreturns.com/

Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by nxmnxm99 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:46AM (#34327588)
Except gold has value. Crypto does not.
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by lottin on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @12:12PM (#34328064)
I don't think I'm following you. You're using technical terms such as 'parameter space' in the wrong context. Maybe you want to sound clever, but you aren't making a lot of sense.
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by nxmnxm99 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:54AM (#34324844)
Well yes - but the assumption is that demand will drop as more people realize crypto has no long term viability as real financial infrastructure.
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by pjc50 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:21AM (#34325203)
The supply of crypto isn't limited because people can just mint new chains. And of course, the more the number goes up on a chain the less attractive it is to actual users as opposed to holders.
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by danuker on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:49AM (#34325642)
Network effects dictate that value concentrates in the most popular chains. The top few will always dominate.
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by RestlessMind on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @02:17PM (#34330024)
> The supply of crypto isn't limited because people can just mint new chains.

It is silly to lump all crypto coins in a single bucket. BTC is very different than DOGE or SHIB. I guess your parent post was about BTC supply being limited.

Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by pcthrowaway on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:30PM (#34331804)
Interesting you say that, because it's actually very similar to Doge (though of course, dissimilar to Shib, because shib is an ERC20 token on Ethereum)
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by RestlessMind on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @07:17PM (#34333371)
So you also think that The Starry Night in MOMA is worthless because you can buy a very similar one on Etsy for $65? https://www.etsy.com/listing/1317189452/starry-night-by-vinc...
Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by pcthrowaway on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:04PM (#34333665)
I didn't say they were similar value, this is a strawman.

But if we're looking at art, and you show me the original Starry night, a print, and then a picture of the kool-aid man busting through a wall, and ask me which 2 are most similar, I'm going to pick the starry nights

Re:Coinbase cuts staff by a further 20% by RestlessMind on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @10:25PM (#34334680)
> I didn't say they were similar value, this is a strawman.

You actually said that - "Interesting you say that, because it's actually very similar to Doge". Especially when the context was about the value of crypto in relation to supply and demand. Given that you are familiar with SHIB being an ERC20, I am fairly certain you are aware of DOGE's supply being nothing like BTC. And yet you conflate the two. Just for FUD?