News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by jbotz on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @05:00AM (#34322581)
Hah! In Brazil nowadays pretty much all babies are born by C-section. Why? Doctors like it because it's more convenient since you can schedule it, whereas natural birth happens when it happens. Women like it because it happens under anesthetic and for (ahem) cosmetic reasons.
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by christophilus on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @05:35AM (#34322830)
It happens in the US, too. Convenience for the doctor trumps the health of the woman, it seems.
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by ekianjo on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @05:29AM (#34322787)
cosmetic? ending up with a scar is cool?
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by techstrategist on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @05:35AM (#34322835)
More likely that the choice is about avoiding the physical effects of the alternative.
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by petercooper on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @05:59AM (#34323010)
Without being graphic, having something so large pass through a birth canal that is usually a lot smaller can have lasting physical effects (but not always!)
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by ekianjo on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:06AM (#34324230)
your tummy sees the light more (summer, beach, etc) than the other part you refer to. So if you care about cosmetics I'd wage people would go for something that does not leave a huge scar over their guts.
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by hnbad on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:37AM (#34324643)
You're comparing a surgical scar in your abdomen (which these days can be done pretty minimally invasive in some cases) to unpredictable tearing into the perineum (and in extreme cases even into the rectum), not to mention likely complications from birth like (temporary) incontinence.

I wouldn't advocate for routine c-sections and it is still surgery with all the risk that entails, but if you're not generally prone to scarring, the optimal outcome for a c-section can be far more predictable and doesn't have to involve a "huge scar over [your] guts".

Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by bondarchuk on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:19AM (#34324394)
It's about avoiding damage/wear/stretching to the vagina (since people seem too squeamish to say it directly..).
Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by pnutjam on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:43AM (#34325546)
Vaginal tearing is pretty common, as are anal fissures. They often cut the vagina to avoid tearing, easier to heal; but not fun either.

That all heals with no real differences, but some women have issues with their pelvic floor and postpartum bleeding. I think some of that is mitigated by a c-section.

Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by Jakob on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @06:09AM (#34323064)
I thought that was unnecessary, too, until I saw many women that had lasting issues due to natural births where things broke that do not fully heal anymore and permanently reduce their quality of life.

In some countries, an involuntary C-section (because of complications) becomes also prohibitively expensive, so people opt for the voluntary one to risk-manage.

It’s less black and white for me now.

Re:A patient without cavities visits 180 dentists by lupire on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:06AM (#34325005)
Every human birth is natural. If you mean "vaginal delivery", say "vaginal delivery".