Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on An Open Letter on the Open Gaming License, to Wizards of the Coast. Parent comment
Lawyers cost money.
> And if they did a full rewrite, are they under any obligation at all to Wizards of the Coast?
The theory is that they are not.
> If they used the OGL to allow third-parties for Pathfinder, not D&D, what does this have to do with WotC?
People point out that the PF2 works have OGL licenses.
I'm sure we'll all find out in the coming weeks/months
There are no comments on this comment yet.
Lawyers cost money.
> And if they did a full rewrite, are they under any obligation at all to Wizards of the Coast?
The theory is that they are not.
> If they used the OGL to allow third-parties for Pathfinder, not D&D, what does this have to do with WotC?
People point out that the PF2 works have OGL licenses.
I'm sure we'll all find out in the coming weeks/months