The author certainly claims to be Gail themselves; note the reference to “my husband”

Ok i could be wrong. Was commenting after reading arbitration documents where respondent is referred as "The Respondent is Kevin Watson"

https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d200...

"The Respondent registered the domain name <gail.com> on April 4, 1996, named after his wife’s given name, as a birthday present for his wife. "

So yes, looks like was wrong. It's his wife's site (A gift)

Yes, that's what the link that you're commenting on says. You didn't need to do any more research, especially not into arbitration documents.