Re:Stop Filming Strangers in 2023
by viewtransform on Sunday January 08, 2023 @03:37PM
(#34302839)
I see a market for software that replaces those faces with "AI" faces.
There's my startup idea for the day.
That actually sounds like a totally valid use for those AI face generators. Gotta be hella better'n a big ol' blur or giant pixels where a face should be.
Watch out for that uncanny valley.
Already done. Here was a link, like 1-2 months ago about a reality TV show or so wich replaced all faces with ai. Sadly I can’t find it right now.
Re:Stop Filming Strangers in 2023
by rippercushions on Sunday January 08, 2023 @04:14PM
(#34303203)
> As an artist, mosaics and bars over the face can be such an ugly mark on one’s work.
Connoisseurs of Japanese art will know that legally mandated mosaics are not limited to faces.
I assume this means NSFW stuff? I never see anyone call themself a "connoisseur" of art unless it's porn.
Re:Stop Filming Strangers in 2023
by toomuchtodo on Sunday January 08, 2023 @06:32PM
(#34304589)
It was a clever, tasteful way of communicating that, yes.
Not sure how tasteful it was
https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/glossary/connoi...
"A connoisseur is a collector and/or art lover who is knowledgeable about works of art, in the sense of being able to recognise characteristic individual or regional styles.
This skill is based on familiarity with a large number of pictures, and the ability to retain a visual memory of them."
*On the internet
Rule 34
Re:Stop Filming Strangers in 2023
by brippalcharrid on Sunday January 08, 2023 @07:22PM
(#34305047)
I wonder how this works in the case of identical twins, in which a person could independently contract to distribute a likeness that was indistinguishable from that of the other person.
Re:Stop Filming Strangers in 2023
by dangmyaccount on Monday January 09, 2023 @11:04AM
(#34311860)
So, I love japanese photography and their street photography is very lively and rooted in decades of tradition. A couple of years ago a famous photographer got some backlash for being "inconsiderate" but only lost his partnership with a famous camera manufacturer.
How does this law fit with the very alive and active community of publishing street photographers?
> “It isn’t a criminal offense to photograph people’s faces in public, but it can be a civil offense if the person who has been photographed finds their likeness published anywhere. They can make a case against the photographer on the grounds of breach of privacy,” says Tia. “The threat of being identified in a creative’s work and suffering consequences for it is all the victim needs to prove in court.”
> That’s why on most Japanese blogs, YouTube videos, and television programs, the faces of bystanders are blurred, an arduous and artistically painful process for any passionate creative. Tia says it best: “As an artist, mosaics and bars over the face can be such an ugly mark on one’s work.”