Ironic since safety laws is what put the screens in the cars in the first place, the regulation requiring backup camera's which required large screen to show the picture.

>>in the case of USB-C charging e-waste

lol, yea that is not the reason for USB-C regulation, nor was that needed at all, and that will handicap either the EU or global innovation. What ever comes next to replace USB-C either now will never be made and will be stuck (I hope not, because USB-C is terrible) or the EU will be left behind has the rest of the world moves on to the better thing

> Ironic since safety laws is what put the screens in the cars in the first place

Screens themselves aren't the issue. They didn't mandate touch screens, or the removal of non-touch controls.

(EDIT: in fact, the removal of non-touch controls in place of touch controls is a perfect example of the market resulting in a race-to-the-bottom cost-saving measure that you're in denial of in your other comments).

> lol, yea that is not the reason for USB-C regulation

Care to elaborate on what the reason is then? Because that's the reason I've seen given.

> What ever comes next to replace USB-C either now will never be made and will be stuck

This is misleading. The law is flexible in that regard, and in fact the commission will be required to regularly amend the law.

> or the EU will be left behind has the rest of the world moves on to the better thing

Fortunately, the EU market is too big to ignore.

>They didn't mandate touch screens

ofcourse... they just mandated a large expensive screen that naturally the automakers and consumers would love to have right up front visible to the driver for about 10secs per use of the vehicle and be used for nothing else ever.

This is the kind of "forethought" that makes for terrible regulation, and unintended consequences, I bet you would make for a great elected official, ever consider running for office?

If you are going to mandate some large and expensive be put in a predominant spot of a product, that thing is going to be used for multiple functions, it is unrealistic, and a denial of reality to expect anything less

>>Care to elaborate on what the reason is then? Because that's the reason I've seen given.

I am sure that is the stated reason, there is no actual data to back that up since converters to and from the various charging standards are easily available there is no reason to believe that a device having or not having USB-C contributes at all to ewaste. No one is toss out their iPhone because it has a lighting cable, and most are not even tossing the chargers as for less than $5 you can get any adapter to any other port...

EU addiction to regulation is a real problem.

>>Fortunately, the EU market is too big to ignore.

For now, the EU economy has been largely stagnant since about 2008, Though this year seems to have has a bump largely due to inflation which means it is still flat.

EU is not really a growth market for any one.

nominal gdp went from 11 tril in 2008 to 14.5 tril in 2021, averaging about 1.66% per year. That's not flat. Are you using some different kind of metric?

PS more to the point, the next entity that comes anywhere close to that number is Japan and its several times smaller, so eu will remain relevant for a while even if it completely stops growing.

You must have forgotten the days where all chargers had a molded cable instead of the USB-A socket that is standard these days, and the plug was different for each and every brand. So each phone came with both a custom cable and a custom charger.

Then came micro USB, which was used for ALOT of devices, and still is

Then came Apple brought Lightening which USB then responded with USB-C

>> where all chargers had a molded cable

So, you can still put an adapter on the end.

> So, you can still put an adapter on the end.

So you have changed your problem from finding one of N charger to finding one of N(N-1) adapters, assuming someone actually built and sold for example a Samsung-to-LG adapter. Not a great improvement.

Im fine with that and maybe music playlist control

But for the rest traditional are better

The ggp post was about EU requirements. A backup camera is not required in the EU, that's a US requirement. EU requires a warning system when going backwards, but that's beeping, not showing a picture (a camera/screen wouldn't satisfy the warning-requirement).

Some cars put the picture from the backup camera in the rearview mirror. There was no mandate to use a big tablet size screen anywhere.