Re:Twilio’s toll fraud problem
by tgsovlerkhgsel on Thursday January 05, 2023 @09:22PM
(#34270149)
Arbitration is likely even more expensive than a dispute.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twilio’s toll fraud problem
by Scoundreller on Thursday January 05, 2023 @09:57PM
(#34270396)
More choice of arbitration firms than credit card arbitration firms (for them, not you!)
Re:Twilio’s toll fraud problem
by tgsovlerkhgsel on Saturday January 07, 2023 @05:12PM
(#34293480)
Doesn't help if each arbitration case costs a low triple-digit amount in arbitration fees + creates an expensive case in the legal department.
The arbitration is painful because of the costs (financial and staffing/handling) of the process, not the outcome.
At the individual dispute level but in the long run arbitration means you don't lose your risk level which will almost always cost you a lot more than whatever the actual arbitration/credit disputes cost.
Re:Twilio’s toll fraud problem
by tgsovlerkhgsel on Saturday January 07, 2023 @05:11PM
(#34293471)
I suspect (but may be wrong, I don't know how trigger-happy the risk level changes are) the absolute number of events needed to trigger a risk level loss at the scale of Twilio would also represent a catastrophic number of arbitration cases.