I can imagine that porn with animals (even cartoons) might be disgusting to some people. There is a reason why bestiality is quite high in the list of social taboos.

In context of stable diffusion it’s something that would be extremely difficult to generate, and therefore a good example in a prompt-crafting class.

I’d say it’s an odd choice, except there are also plenty of others.

Does beast-on-beast qualify as beastiality?

I always thought that was just, you know, a Tuesday on Animal Planet?

Probably not, but animal planet isn't made explicitly for human sexual gratification, so the comparison is a bit disingenuous

It was in the context of furry porn being upsetting. Not sure if panda furry on fox furry counts as beastiality. Maybe? It seems different.

In the end though, I blame Disney.

I thought exactly the same. I think people just think that furry stuff and zoo/bestiality stuff are the same thing.

The second prompt includes "child, young".

Yuck.

It’s a negative prompt, so a prompt to make it less likely to use things that could be tagged "child" or "young".

If you find that yucky, you need help.

You can spare me your snarky remarks. I was not aware that these keywords specified a negative prompt, but I still think that you even have to specify to a diffusion model that you would like your bestiality pornography without children in it is disgusting.