Re:First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making...
by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @11:52AM
(#34247993)
Then why not <?go ... ?> instead of the random ^ soup?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making...
by paulsmith on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @11:58AM
(#34248104)
Why is that better?
Re:First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making...
by nablaone on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @12:10PM
(#34248292)
Looks like other SSRs. FEDs will thank you.
In real word HTML template are 90% DIVs, 10% generated content.
Re:First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making...
by sunbum on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @12:08PM
(#34248265)
Internationalization, not every keyboard has ^ easily accessible.
Re:First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making...
by andrewgilmartin on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @07:26PM
(#34254076)
Please, no. Let's not intermix <> code fragments with <> html elements. Have you witnessed the nightmare of reading and updating JSTL, for example?
Re:First public release of Pushup: a new compiler for making...
by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @08:25PM
(#34254651)
Meh, JSP and PHP do this already. JSP is of course <%… %>. ColdFusion does it all the time. It’s easier on the eye, especially with editor support, than having to scan for all those ^ characters.