Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by citizen-stig on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:07AM
(#34229447)
It is easy to choose for others, isn’t it?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by mshake2 on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:13AM
(#34229491)
"Steve took a chance on us and believed in our crazy dream of making computer-animated films; the one thing he always said was to simply 'make it great.' He is why Pixar turned out the way we did and his strength, integrity, and love of life has made us all better people. He will forever be a part of Pixar's DNA."
Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by causi on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:33AM
(#34229587)
You're quoting the top two Pixar executives, and from immediately after Jobs' death as well. How about someone who isn't a millionaire?
Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by mshake2 on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:41AM
(#34229637)
A legendary animator and director, both who helped found Pixar with Jobs, aren't credible because they became so successful that they're now millionaire executives?
Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by jjtheblunt on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @05:53AM
(#34230006)
Jobs didn’t found Pixar; it spun out of George Lucas’ world and works and Jobs bought into it when it was several years old, even several years with the name Pixar. The Wikipedia article is self contradictory as its first paragraphs talk as of hee were a as founder, but hee was a much later major investor.
Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by mshake2 on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:56AM
(#34229715)
So far I haven't seen a counter experience from you about how Jobs treated the "regular workers" at Pixar, so as I see it, it's a quote from people who were close to what happened versus the absence of a counter experience.
Re:Sergey Brin: “Irate Call from Steve Jobs”
by austinjp on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @05:59AM
(#34230042)
Oh please. Googling "steve jobs bully pixar" reveals at least one story of horrible behavior directed toward regular staff members.
Jobs could be a bully, it's well documented. Pixar wasn't somehow immune to this behavior.
You've painted a utilitarian, partisan viewpoint: that the cultural and technological significance of Pixar outweighs any negative experiences of staff. The two are not easily comparable. How do you quantify them, what's the denominator? Jobs didn't have a crystal ball, he couldn't know Pixar would succeed. What was his calculus? How did he determine the trade-offs between success and bullying? Finally, cultural/tech significance is most certainly possible without putting staff through negative experiences.