Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by rgrieselhuber on Sunday January 01, 2023 @06:44PM
(#34212436)
I just don’t see the “outsized to their contributions” part. The bureaucracy is built off the tax dollars of the people who first decided to settle there but you could probably reduce that tax burden and bureaucracy by a large percentage and the people living there, as long as they felt a good reason to do so, would continue to create a decent quality of lives for themselves. Either way, we’re basically just debating ideology at this point.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become...
by BirdieNZ on Sunday January 01, 2023 @09:47PM
(#34213663)
The easiest way to compare is to look at what a family of renters get vs a family of landowners. In a city with growing land values, the renters get nothing but the landowners get a lot, yet their contributions as "families contributing to society" would be equivalent.