News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by wolverine876 on Saturday December 31, 2022 @04:09PM (#34200762)
> Ownership to me is if I spend $300 on a lawn mower, it's mine forever with no future costs associated to it beyond repairs. I can do whatever I want with it, including modifying how it works or smashing it into a thousand pieces. Both of which are true if you buy a lawn mower today.

This in old, tired theoretical argument. Your lawnmower won't have much impact on your neighbor, but there are things you can't do with it: (e.g., modify it to emit poisonous gas, make painfully loud noises, or fling objects at high speed through your neighbor's window).

The answer is simply, you are subject to the law. If that makes you not free and oppressed, then you are not free and oppressed.

Re:JPMorgan to spend $1B on rental homes in the US to become... by dsfyu404ed on Saturday December 31, 2022 @04:40PM (#34201053)
There is a huge difference between being able to do basically whatever you want with your property pursuant to the law and being constrained by whatever a typical rental contract for that type of property is. To imply otherwise is lying just lying with some fluff on top.