Re:No, Romanian Cops Did Not Find Andrew Tate Because of a P...
by beyond_based on Friday December 30, 2022 @01:04PM
(#34187786)
To be fair this whole topic is off-topic for HN. I wish the so called “guidelines” would disallow shitflinging threads like these.
To center in on your question, body shaming, or rather body allowance, was never about some egalitarian, altruistic goal. When dealing with mass or social media, you are in a feminine-centric sphere of communication so the garbage in and garbage out that flows is catered to them. It’s bitches flexing on each other, and men are bending sideways to try to understand the games they play. Eventually the bitches flex on men because they know the men are too weak and crippled by the state to do anything about it (short of beating the shit out of them, as they should).
Tate represents an intrusion into this sphere because he’s not playing by their rules, so they’re using the old playbook of trying to ridicule man from a woman’s point of view (are you surprised at this point?). It’s again just games between women.
To center in on your question, body shaming, or rather body allowance, was never about some egalitarian, altruistic goal. When dealing with mass or social media, you are in a feminine-centric sphere of communication so the garbage in and garbage out that flows is catered to them. It’s bitches flexing on each other, and men are bending sideways to try to understand the games they play. Eventually the bitches flex on men because they know the men are too weak and crippled by the state to do anything about it (short of beating the shit out of them, as they should).
Tate represents an intrusion into this sphere because he’s not playing by their rules, so they’re using the old playbook of trying to ridicule man from a woman’s point of view (are you surprised at this point?). It’s again just games between women.