beyond_based

I’m going to be deadass with you brother. We don’t have a functioning society, we have an immigration labor camp.

Which game? This sounds awfully familiar.

You have to look at it from a certain perspective. It’s not just misogynist. It’s also misandrist. I don’t just blame women, I blame the men for failing to uphold society to a higher moral standard and letting petty things like envy, greed, and selfishness take over them, at which point a woman can easily further manipulate them to do their bidding. Our increasingly decadent society wouldn’t be so if men realized they hold the keys to building and maintaining prosperous societies, and can refuse the corrupt inclinations of women hellbent on ruining it all for materialistic, personal gain. And that of other men who desire power and money and materialistic things for the sad approval of women.

The reason why I don’t mind the flagging and the downvotes is because I don’t expect a single individual on HN to publicly agree with me. Anecdotally and privately, women and men have both echoed these things to me in a slightly more nuanced, forgiving tone. My take is more brazen, and unpalatable for this site and many others.

Personally, I don’t subscribe to the manosphere, MRAs, MGTOWs, the Andrew Tates or anyone inbetween. These are all symptoms of a societal illness.

Entirely serious. It’s short to keep it to a point and so some nuance is missing, but there you have it.

I don’t mind the flagging - I don’t expect anything more from people unwilling to take a look at things objectively.

It’s too late and the problem isn’t even with the foreign buyers anyway. It never has been. Much like complaining about zoning, It’s a dumb misdirection play that people fall for every time.

This will be easy to side-step as it has been done all along now. Linking a random redditors interpretation is absolutely meaningless.

This Time The World, by GLR.

To be fair this whole topic is off-topic for HN. I wish the so called “guidelines” would disallow shitflinging threads like these.

To center in on your question, body shaming, or rather body allowance, was never about some egalitarian, altruistic goal. When dealing with mass or social media, you are in a feminine-centric sphere of communication so the garbage in and garbage out that flows is catered to them. It’s bitches flexing on each other, and men are bending sideways to try to understand the games they play. Eventually the bitches flex on men because they know the men are too weak and crippled by the state to do anything about it (short of beating the shit out of them, as they should).

Tate represents an intrusion into this sphere because he’s not playing by their rules, so they’re using the old playbook of trying to ridicule man from a woman’s point of view (are you surprised at this point?). It’s again just games between women.

Better yet, most of us don’t even need to read the Early Life section to figure out who is behind things.